“What do we do now?” A 2017 Call-To-Action!

From way back I’ve been interested in politics. Actually interested may be an understatement. I remember being consoled while crying by the principal in 1968 as a 4th grader in North Dakota. It was the day after the Humphrey/Nixon election and I couldn’t understand why the black constituent in the South side of Chicago didn’t turnout to vote as Democrats expected. If they would have; Illinois would have swung to Humphrey, no one would have had a majority (George Wallace was also in the race) – and the election would have been thrown into the House of Representatives. Having a Democratic majority, the House most likely would have voted in Hubert Humphrey as president. And at the time that was a big deal to me … for some reason.

It wasn’t that I liked one party more than the other – I just seemed to like Humphrey. I hung around at the campaign headquarters for both parties that year, pretty much every day after school. My room was so full of campaign paraphernalia that I had to move yard signs to even get in bed at night. When you’re nine, reasons for doing things don’t seem to make as much sense looking back. Regardless, the event was permanently imprinted in mind and started me down the path of political obsession.

Well here we are in 2017 … and it was another of those: “What the hell happened?” But this time I need to add: “Why the hell did they vote like they did?” Only the it’s not just the south side of Chicago – it’s a good portion of the whole damn country.

Tell me why 42% of women voted for Donald Trump. This is astounding since the proof is overwhelming he seems to have only marginal respect for the gender. And then we have the recipients of Obamacare who because of financial hardship or pre-existing conditions had previously no access to health insurance. While receiving heavy subsidies often enabling them to be insured for the first time – they chose to vote for Trump even though a cornerstone of his campaign was to repeal Obamacare. What gives?


It’s been a few weeks since the election and I’ve been trying to write a piece that will help me understand this whole political craziness that seems to have overtaken us in America. Yet again I feel like Alice in the rabbit hole. I’ve probably started and stopped more times than I can count. I have five drafts going in different directions only to metaphorically rip the paper from the typewrite and crumple it up.

Maybe I was going through the stages of grief with each draft being a stage I progressed through. That might a bit strong since I had no real affinity for Hillary Clinton even though I did vote for her. But for the sake of the metaphor, let’s say I arrived at the acceptance stage. Now since I’ve accepted the fact that a guy known for “You’re Fired” will be president of the United States – this is me coming to grips with it. So here is my 2017 Call-To-Action.

But first …

The election is over and it’s time to spend our collective energies, Democrats and Republicans alike, building up America – not tearing it down. With a Republican congress, and considering politics trump (pun intended) civic responsibility and even basic human decency … there’s no hope of Donald Trump of not taking office – and probably little chance of impeachment either. Plus there was a hell of a lot of problems that needed fixing before Trump. How much more self-inflicted damage can the country take.

And I’m not in favor of protests and civil disobedience for the sake of protesting what might happen. You wouldn’t know it but Trump hasn’t done anything yet. Will he? That remains to be seen. What comes out of Trump’s mouth is not a good indication of his future behavior. The monumental barriers to getting anything done in Washington will likely be his biggest obstacle, not protests. Right now the last thing we need is to risk further division. And living in Montana, further division will not be a pleasant thing. The people doing the pushing back are well-armed and are pretty excited about Obama not being in the White House. There’s not a day that goes by when there’s not letters to editor in the Billings Gazette hating on Hillary Clinton … still. Anything to temper this euphoria won’t be met laying down. Plus, time spent protesting is time spent away from building your community, which is positive regardless of who the president is … especially Trump.

We can all obsess over our country’s government and its merry band of narcissistic lords and ladies climbing all over each other to be the first up the stairs to the top of the ivory tower. Their actions are little different from a meth addict “chasing the bag.” And as with the addict, where the only thing that matters is the drug … most of them are motivated only by the psychopathic drive for power. Nothing we do is going to change this.

This behavior is not limited to Washington D.C. either. Let’s look at North Carolina. Successful efforts by a Republican governor and a Republican legislature has gerrymandered the state into a farce of inequity. According to recent report by Electoral Integrity Project, the state can no longer be considered a democracy with an electoral score falling next to that of Cuba and Sierra Leon. In fact North Carolina is not only the worst state in the Unite States for unfair districting – but the worst entity in the world ever analyzed by the Electoral Integrity Project. Chalk one up for our system of checks and balances.

Partisan behavior at the expense of the people is not limited to Republicans either. As they come to the realization that Trump is the leader of the free world – how will the Democratic party react to his administration? Will they follow the example of the Republicans after the Obama election and take obstructionism to even higher levels, putting the American people they are sworn to protect, directly in the crosshairs? That’s the tactics Elizabeth Warren, a probable 2020 presidential candidate, wants to use. With the old battle-ax Nancy Pelosi still firmly planted on the throne of the Democrat party in the House — it’s a safe bet that delegation will do the same. Being a long time adherent of the party of supposed progress and new ideas, saying this gives me no pleasure.

Over just last week I’ve pruned over 100 people from my follow list on Twitter; not Trump supporters (there wasn’t a whole lot there to start with), but people I love. Unfortunately they’re avid (and sometimes rapid) Clinton voters who can’t let go of the election. “The election was stolen by Putin” or “Trump voters aren’t smart enough to know what’s good for them.” Whether that’s the case or not isn’t their’s to say – nor mine. In many cases they weren’t even voting for Trump. They were voting against Clinton – and that’s a Democrat problem. Regardless, I shutter to think what the streets of America will be like as Trump’s verbose campaign claims fail to materialize, and Democratic obstructionist policies are made out to be the reason why – regardless if they are.

But enough of the doom and gloom. I see little value in this masochistic exercise that results in little more than depression, anger or worse. I’m already close to the tipping point.

A few of days ago I had a Twitter exchange with a buddy of mine from Oregon, Christina Bowen. She suggested I put together a list of action items people can do locally as a response to the upcoming Trump Armageddon (my word, not hers). This conversation dovetailed with my own official realization that “we are where we are” and “it is what is.” I’ve worked through my personal stages of grief and “where I’m at” is angry and very motivated. I’ve been beating this “government isn’t the answer” drum for years now so this Trump thing really shouldn’t surprise me. What it’s done though has ratcheted up my sense of urgency.

Build Your Community With Direct Action

Building a playground accomplishes a lot more than just raising money to pay a contractor or expecting the government to do it. It’s yours. You and your neighbors built it. It’s a point of connection, a commonality – something we need desperately right now. The act of coming together and working together with those of opposing views, political and other, is a greater benefit than what you built. Now you’re looking at your neighbor as exactly that, a neighbor – not a Democrat or a Republican. He’s not just a label reduced to a single polarizing characteristic. He’s a person. He has kids that go to the same school as yours and play together. He’s a person who has hopes and dreams like you. And none of it have anything to do with who he voted for in 2016 presidential election.

Helping a family inflicted with cancer goes a lot further than participating in a cancer walk where who knows where the money ends up … except probably not where you were walking. While I applaud the camaraderie of cancer walkers, and runners and bikers – the same can be accomplished by directly helping those inflicted by the disease, and family members alike. Having recently gone through chemotherapy and likely having to face it again this year, cancer’s tentacles of horribleness do not end with the patient. Being a pseudo-caregiver to my elderly parents – I know.

These situations exemplify why I built the Community 3.0. When I began, Obama was president and Clinton by all accounts was up next. At the time the need for direct civic action was important … but now local civic action and volunteerism is an imperative if we expect to hang on to any semblance of a developed nation, let alone one like the one we’re accustomed to. And a case could be made that the very survival of the planet lies in the efforts of us in our cities and neighborhoods. Our cities are us – not the city council, the county commissioners or the mayor. 

Our work in the streets must be arm and arm with our friends and neighborhoods – no matter if they’re conservative, liberal, progressive or libertarian. The unemployed miner in conservative Wyoming and the minimum wage hotel worker in liberal Los Angeles will have to deal with the same government action and inaction. We have to resist the urge to hate and be vindictive towards other of the opposite political party. We must be the antidote for the unbridled narcissism of our politicians hell-bent on the retention of power at any expense … including ours.

Jennifer Lawrence’s turn as Katniss has come and gone but I fear the Hunger Games may very well be upon us in a real sense if we don’t band together and mend the social safety net and change our expectations of civic responsibility. How far away are we from literally fiction become reality. For some – we may already be there.

“What we need is a an entirely new world of possibility that transcends the insane politics and diminished leadership of our times.” – Andrew Markell

In the piece What do the genetics of a Bengal Cat and the evolution of economics have in common? I concepted an alternative governance model birthed from the union of the David Hume philosophy of “spontaneous order” and our inherent benevolence, and Elinor Ostrom’s “opportunity of the commons.” Government will still exist in its present form but relied upon less, economically, psychologically and sociologically. It would be augmented by pragmatic community-based action originating in the locally owned business community. The Norwegians have a name for this type of civic calling – dugnad: Unpaid voluntary, orchestrated community work.

Central to this hybrid alternative is collaboration of small businesses and the community in solving civic problems directly through the Front Porch civic gathering concept. In Minot, North Dakota where I grew up we had Charlie’s Restaurant and Elks Lodge. These were the places where the “business of the community” was done – more so than at the weekly city council meetings. These Front Porches were where ideas were hatched, risks taken and the future of Minot was mapped out … often under the influence of a libation or two. There was no formal membership or no elections – just people who voluntarily wanted to make things happen and better the town.

Make 2017 The Year Of The Front Porch

Why not make 2017 the year you start a Front Porch in your community?Don’t just include the usual suspects, but those the usual suspects pay little attention to. Find the people in your community who always seem to be new helping out – yet aren’t part of the power elite. Most of all – encourage people from all socioeconomic groupings to participate. Imagine what a single mother raising a child in a motel has to offer in perspective.

But most of all, include your community’s young people. Your local students should be your “foot soldiers of change” empowered to create a community that fits their needs and desires, not just those of their parents. They have the ideas and energy to guide your community into the future, not hold it in the past. You can’t afford to ignore this invaluable asset.

Under this model Front Porches (small businesses) will sponsor volunteer campaigns or Solutions. These Solutions can range from organizing a cleanup effort, to fixing a playground, to even spearheading a high school mentoring or apprentice program. Whether young or old, any community resident should be able to get involved. And on top of it helping and supporting others may be key to living a longer and healthier life, according to new research from the University of Basel in Switzerland.

I could add more action items to the list, but I’m taking the advice from the New Years resolution experts. Focus on one thing. So there you be. Go out and start a Front Porch and organize a Solution to one of your community’s pressing needs. Just imagine if everyone did the same – or least helped out with one of them. You’d have a community on volunteer steroids.

old woman posterize

Isolation, Illness … And Hate

Over the last couple of weeks several articles surfaced on the detrimental health effects of loneliness on the elderly and how it’s becoming an epidemic. And things always seem worse when we’re sick and there’s no one there to lean on for support. This is especially the case in rural areas where the sparse population adds to the isolation. This condition isn’t exclusive to the elderly either. The same can even be said when we feel isolated in our communities because our religious, social or political views.

Can these health detriments due to isolation be a breeding ground for hate? The outsized elderly vote for Donald Trump and his message of division and national isolation makes a case for it. Sadly I’ve never seen hate rise to levels of today. Why is this? Could it be the source of it is the unprecedented level loneliness and isolation in America? Maybe. Hannah Arendt in The Origins of Totalitarianism, her chronicle on the rise of Nazism makes a parallel argument decades ago.

Terror can rule absolutely only over men who are isolated against each other… Therefore, one of the primary concerns of all tyrannical government is to bring this isolation about. Isolation may be the beginning of terror; it certainly is its most fertile ground; it always is its result. This isolation is, as it were, pretotalitarian; its hallmark is impotence insofar as power always comes from men acting together…; isolated men are powerless by definition.

Has America turned into a nation of isolated, sick and angry people -waiting impatiently for someone to ride in on a white horse to save them from their lives of misery  – no matter the consequences? Politics is killing us, literally. If all this isn’t enough to make us wake from our cerebral stupor … then what will?

I don’t remember a time when there’s been a civic Call-To-Action like this. Will we use this urgency to build a more connected society focused on doing and helping … or will we let it slip further into the abyss of intractable allegiance to political ideology and hate? No party or candidate is going to do it for us – no matter how many campaign promises.

This is an opportunity for America to wake up and create a new set of civic habits – habits that revolve around direct engagement and extreme neighborliness – regardless the neighbor.

In 2017 I challenge all of you to pull yourself away from Facebook and Twitter, go out get your hands dirty and actually make your community a better place. The United States constitution begins with “We the people…” not “We the minions under the spell of the clowns in Washington D.C. waiting passively for someone to save our asses.” If we can’t muster up enough energy and care enough about our neighbors to make an effort … maybe we don’t even deserve to live in the country our forefathers founded. Think about it.

Our true destiny is a world built from the bottom up by competent citizens living in solid communities, engaged in and by their places. – David W. Orr


Related Posts:

Dugnad … The Next Chapter for the Progressive Movement

“We have to be idealists, thus we can make man what he is capable of being.” — Viktor Frankl

It is striking how many of the world’s problems are created by leaders who lost their way and fail to live up to basic idealistic principles. Somehow idealism is perceived as weakness in current times and not as a sign of courage or integrity. In the words of author and thinker Peter Block: When we defend idealism, we defend imagination. We defend possibility. We defend the world of ideas.” The argument against idealism is an argument against democracy, an argument against love, an argument against justice and equity, and all the things that our culture has abandoned in the name of privatization and economic profit maximization. 

Earlier this year we saw a movement in the United States spearheaded by young people. Bernie Sanders, with no help from the media nor the party establishment (in fact just the opposite), made a serious run for the Democratic presidential nomination. Seventy-five years old, bespectacled with white disheveled hair, visually he was the not the prototypical candidate to embody the hopes and dreams of the Millennial generation, those fifty-plus years his junior. But in many states garnering over eighty percent of that demographic’s primary vote … he was.

While many pundits attach Sander’s popularity with his campaign promises of free college education and universal healthcare (whatever that’s means) – I’ve believe there was something less concrete behind it … something more philosophical. Even though he was a self-proclaimed socialist, he attracted people who would never have referred to themselves as that. I believe what drew people into Sander’s lair was his nebulous aura of idealism. He represented something that could be; something different from what currently is. His primary opponent Hillary Clinton embodied the status quo. Sanders did just the opposite.

Unfortunately for his supporters, and for idealists everywhere, his campaign couldn’t make up deficit it was put in by those in power in the Democratic National Committee. How different things might have been if Sanders and Clinton entered the race on even footing. Thus was not the case – so here we are with our presidential options consisting of a career politician who is the very definition of a Washington insider … and an orange clown who nobody knows what level of Dante’s Hell he could relegate us to. To put our future in the hands of either, thinking they will lead us to the “promised land,” is well … not very idealistic.

But this doesn’t mean we need to throw in our civic towel and spend the next four years licking our wounds. I’m afraid to say, Washington probably won’t be much different then than it is now. Regardless of party, who we put in the White House is going to have to stare down into the same abyss of governmental dysfunction.

“The man in the white hat, the man on the white horse … he ain’t coming.”

What we need to do is not waste this momentum of “striving for something different.” Rather than let our idealism whither with the defeat of a candidate, let’s rejuvenate it by taking it to the streets – and turn it to reality ourselves through action … not just voting.

We are in a precarious position right now, both as a nation and worldwide. Most of all it affects our young people. The Millennial generation is often looked at as being entrepreneurial and breaking the mold. In actuality, this is not true. Millennials are less entrepreneurial than their parents. The reason for this are multi-fold. The societal obsession of higher education for everyone and the debt that accompanies it has created a generation more risk-adverse. Young people are so loaded up on school loans they have to get regular jobs to pay for it. And maybe even more so, a stifling preponderance of mega-corporations owning the business landscape has left little opportunity for a fledging entrepreneurial idea to take wing. America has become much the same as the oligarchy-ridden Gilded Age of a century ago or even Russia today. No presidential candidate, no matter the promises and well-intentions, is going to change this. 

“The man in the white hat, the man on the white horse … he ain’t coming.”

Change will have to take place in the streets by those who live there … not in the ivory towers of Washington D.C..

Evolution Institution

Dugnad is one of those concept type words. You know the ones that cannot be defined by a few sentences on paper because they embody so much more than that. They are words with cultural resonance that represent a way of life or an expectation, which is not easy to translate.

Dugnad can best be described as a type of civic and communal mindset where people get together and volunteer to fix, clean, paint or tidy things up for the betterment of their community. If you live in Norway I am pretty certain you will have already heard this term or even participated in one. Dugnads are organized in neighborhoods, blocks of flats, at summer homes, marinas, mountain cabins even at schools and especially places of work. The dugnad knows no bounds! It can be summed up as a time of coming together and contributing to the community that you are a part of. Most of us belong to several communities or groups so it is possible that your presence is required at multiple dugnads throughout year.

Last month the World Economic Forum released a study ranking countries on their ability to convert economic growth into well-being for their citizens. Norway came out on top. While there are many reasons for this, I’m sure no small one is their focus on community engagement in the form of dugnads. Not only do these civic gathering entities mend the social safety net, they build the Middle Ring, or neighborhood relationships that transcend ideologies and politics.

It’s around the concept of dugnad that I’ve organized the Community 3.0 platform for civic engagement. It’s time we all pull out our sewing kits and get to work mending the societal well-being safety net our alleged leaders have so negligently let almost fray to the point of no return.

Our call to action must be one of taking to the streets, not to protest but to act … to implement our idealism ourselves. In the Community 3.0 model, the dugnads take form in the Front Porches of our communities. These informal meeting places, most often locally owned businesses, are named after the front yard gathering spots so often seen in Latino communities that are used for neighborhood discussion and connection to the street. These Front Porches are where the Middle Ring or neighborhood relationships flourish. This is what the French political philosopher, Alex de Tocqueville, observed as the source of America’s “exceptionalism” of the 1800’s.

As a part of the Community 3.0 platform we’ve put together a roster of several examples of what can result from Front Porch collaborations. These examples represent Solutions to many common needs and opportunities a community may encounter. By no means is this roster complete, but it’s a start – enough to get your synaptic connections firing.

The Solutions I listed above are mainly the products of the volunteer work of an single independent Front Porch. But that doesn’t mean multiple Front Porches can’t band together for a larger more community-wide common cause. An extreme example of this is the Let’s Do It! worldwide clean-up effort I mentioned in a recent post. But regardless of the size of the project, this dugnad approach to civic engagement involves a significant change in societal thinking: “one of doing rather than waiting for someone else to do the doing.”

Rather than myopically obsess on economic growth as most all governments do, the Community 3.0 Front Porch approach focuses on destroying the“silos”that retard our evolution. This bridging of chasms improves the overall well-being of our community including the physical, cerebral (avenues to self-actualization) and spiritual health of its citizens.

The priority of these Front Porches is to create environments that nurture hope by empowering avenues for us to engage with our world and express our creativity through a Solutionist mindset – letting the inherent benevolence inside us bloom. By making “helping others” our societal norm and expectations … we will supplant that of the hopeless climb up the ladder of our current economic caste system.

Build … Don’t Tear Down

I know it’s frustrating to think that our options look bad and worse. The seeds of optimism that took hold with the Bernie Sanders campaign are running the risk of being starved of the emotional momentum they need to survive. And without metaphorical food and water, it’s doubtful they will withstand a another four years until the next election.

Never doubt that a small group of committed, citizens can change the world. It is the only thing that ever has. ~ Margaret Mead

But this is the case only if we view our only option is turning over our lives to someone sitting in the White House. Our real solution lies right here in our home towns – both large or small. It is us who must make the change, not the government. It’s always been that way … whether we realize it or not.

But being committed does not mean marching in the streets demanding those in the ivory towers change their ways and all of sudden adopt policies of empathy and altruism. However noble this cause may be, Don Quixote best be left to the annuals of fiction past.

Rather than tear down … we must build. We need not walk into the lion’s den and challenge the lion. We starve the lion. After all, the lion is a captive of ours. Our problem is that all along we have been feeding him through our habitual actions, creating a societal mega-corporate personality we’ve let dictate our world.

At first there will not be many of us. But as our success stories spread – others will want the same (i.e “starving the lion”). They will see there is a road other than the one they habitually travel without thinking. We must find ways to work with those intrenched in the status quo. Direct conflict will only harden their cemented views … accomplishing nothing.

There will be defeats. There will be times we want to throw up our hands, let our impatience take over and rush head long into the lion’s den. These are the times we need to continue to build, meticulously one societal brick at a time. Eventually our evolutionary construct will be complete.

Only each one of us can make the decision if we are willing to stand up straight and pull our knuckles off the pavement and reach for the sky. And to do this we all need each other.

The movement of idealism and “hoping things can get better” will only wither if we let it. It will only starve is we assume its success is dependent on others and not the direct volunteer action of us in the streets. The Norwegians made this part of the their communal mindset and even coined a term for it, dugnad.

Maybe it’s time we follow their lead and adopt it for ourselves.


Join me in building your own neighborhood dugnad … and create your own societal evolution.


Related Posts:


Building Community Through “Green” Student Engagement

“Creating communities for the future created by those of the future”

That seems like common sense. Shouldn’t those who will live in the future have a say in what is looks like? Pathetically so, seldom do they. On the contrary, the future normally is designed by those near or at retirement age often mirroring what the past was like seen through their rose-colored glasses. Young people, especially those not yet of voting age, seldom get a say in the matter. Minors are looked at more as pieces of property with few rights rather as than active civic participants with voices to be heard.

Everywhere communities systematically lose their “best and brightest” as they graduate and go off to college. This is especially problematic in rural areas. Communities can only hope they will return or they can recruit other communities’ “best and brightest” to fill their pipeline. Communities attempt to attract outsiders by mortgaging their towns with subsidies and promises to attract businesses from elsewhere – only to create unsustainable “houses of cards” supported by the fleeting benevolence of these corporate carpetbaggers concerned only for their own pocketbooks. This competition amongst neighboring towns for false hope of prosperity leads to nothing but broken relationships and broken dreams where there should be cooperation and collaboration.

From early ages our young people go to school, school they’re required to attend by law. Isolated in irrelevant silos seven hours a day, often behind locked doors – they are cut off from their community and its prospects of a future there. The connection between school and community is nonexistent. After over a decade behind these locked doors, the top students graduate (hopefully) leaving to go to college – probably never to return. They leave behind a community they never knew, not really knowing what it had to offer. They leave behind potential opportunities, opportunities often right outside the locked doors they couldn’t wait to escape from.

What if this didn’t have to happen? What if the brain drain was replaced with nurture and development? What if irrelevance was replaced engagement? What if the future of your community was built on those who were raised there? And while still young and accessible (mentally and physically), what if these future leaders had a say in what their community was going to look like? What if they had a vested interest, ownership, in their community from the start? Would they still leave? Would you have to try to attract others from elsewhere? Probably not.

Lake Mills cafeteria

The Center For Green Schools

Recently I was introduced to The Center for Green Schools via Mark Swiger. Participating “green schools” reduce the environmental impact of school facilities, both buildings and grounds, while having a positive effect on student and teacher health, and increasing environmental literacy among students and graduates. Working directly with teachers, students, administrators, and their communities, green schools create programs, resources and partnerships that transform schools into healthy environmentally conscious learning environments.

Green school learning environments show students how the connection to their environment both in school and in their community, is not only important … but imperative. And hopefully they take this awareness from their years in school and turn into to a lifetime of environmental stewardship. And through the Green Apple Day of Service program The Center for Green Schools is taking this instruction to the streets through inclusive community service projects, often those organized by students. 

Using School Sustainability as a Tool for Community

Up to this point in my discussion of Community 3.0 and my concept of community empowerment, I’ve focused on the core of civic engagement being small business. These Front Porch gathering spots are the focal point of Community 3.0‘s model for direct participation societal evolution. While I still stand by this – maybe my thinking has been too limited … stuck in one of those silos I so dread. While I’ve included schools and students, they’ve normally been limited to being recipients of the Solutions I’ve presented through the model. However one youth concept I’ve modeled is “Millennials Rising”.

“Millennials Rising” is an opportunity for a community to listen to and utilize the younger generational perspective. Under the model young people, often students, are given an organized to debate, formulate and present issues relevant to not only them as an age group but also the community as a whole. Through the Anti-Congress, younger generations are given a physical forum to strategize how they can be a positive part of their community, beyond the walls of their schools. These students will have the opportunity to beautify their community and make it more sustainable. As “foot soldiers of change,” the young participants of “Millennial Rising” will be empowered to create a community that fits their needs and desires, not just those of their parents and their parents’ friends. 

Our idea of civic infrastructure needs to be broadened. Think more of it as a Cerebral Infrastructure.” By this I mean accommodation for the physical and mental spaces self-employed and small business owners (young and old) need to congregate, collaborate and create – molding the future for themselves and those around them. They want coworking sites and makerspaces. The Millennial generation wants bike paths and sidewalks and trees. They want places. They want their towns, cities and neighborhoods designed for them and their fellow residents … not for cars. They don’t want to be an afterthought, a nuisance to the automobile culture of their parents and grandparents. We need to look beyond tradition and what worked in the past to “now and ahead.” What might have worked a decade ago, may be obsolete today, let alone tomorrow. Hell, maybe their parents and grandparents would even like these new places too given the opportunity.

It’s easy to envision the benefits a project like “Millennials Rising” would have for the young people and students involved. These benefits would also extend to their peers since their futures and needs coincide.

But we can’t understate the benefits that would be had by the community as a whole.

Not only would the community be best positioned to prosper in the future, increased community retention rates in the younger generations would fill employment pipelines. This is especially important in smaller towns and rural communities where much of the work force is reaching retirement. This fact is amplified by the demographic realities of the extraordinary large Baby Boomer generation and their average age being seventy years old. Combine the thinning of the labor pool and increasing health needs of this age group – the health industry in particular is in the middle of an employment shortage crisis. Darren Walker, St. Vincent Healthcare vice president for human resources, hears from job candidates that Billings (where I live) lacks the infrastructure they expect. St. Vincent is the second largest healthcare organization in the Montana and Billings has a population of 100,000. Imagine the problems smaller communities have retaining or attracting young talent.

At present in Billings, Montana, the lead city planner is composing a twenty year long-term plan for the community. While on face value this process may seem prudent, a closer look shows it to be very problematic. To begin with, the planner is retiring later this year. What accountability does she have in it if she’s not going to be around to see its execution? Shouldn’t the one doing the creating also be the one implementing it?

During the course of the plan’s creation, she’s held public input meetings. In a recent meeting she was surprised at the public’s insistence on the inclusion of sections on education and conservation, neither of which she included originally. This is alarming, especially in regards to young generations, where these two areas hold very high priority. In addition, there’s been no indication any efforts to include these younger people in the drafting of it. These are the people who will have to live with this plan (if they chose to stay).

The Billings’ head planner, and indirectly the rest of the city’s leadership, is taking an approach that is the antithesis of what I’m proposing here. And it’s not a stretch to imagine the adverse effects it will have on the retention of young talent in the future.

While “Millennials Rising” attempts to include young people in civic decision-making and placemaking by giving them an organized voice, there is still the process of reaching out to them – extending that welcoming hand from the community. This is easier said than done. But what if they came in unison – as leaders in their own right coming from a place that was an example of progressive sustainability and forward thinking. What if they came from the green schools they attend or have attended bringing with them their knowledge of “how to do it” in an environmentally positive manner. And what if they came as active participants willing to help the community for everyone. Two excellent examples of how this can work would be a collaborative between a Green Apple Day of Service program and the worldwide clean-up effort put together by Let’s Do It! World, of which I’m coordinating for the United States.

Building Community through Student Engagement

What if we took “progressive sustainability and forward thinking” to include all aspects of a community’s well-being. What if we created a systemic approach of integrating the future needs of the community with those of the students as well as the current adults. And what if we made it a priority to identify points of engagement that would connect each individual student with an aspect of their community where they feel they can involve themselves with and make a positive contribution. These “points of engagement” would represent ownership in their community, present and future. They would then want to see it through to the end while becoming a long-term fixture in the community … a community they helped design and build from the time they were young.

Suppose you were designing a school to help students find their own clear end — as clear as that one. Say you were designing a school to elevate and intensify longings. Wouldn’t you want to provide examples of people who have intense longings? Wouldn’t you want to encourage students to be obsessive about worthy things? Wouldn’t you discuss which loves are higher than others and practices that habituate them toward those desires? Wouldn’t you be all about providing students with new opportunities to love? (“Putting Grit In Its Place” David Brooks, New York Times)

Now imagine if these “opportunities to love” where connected if not embedded in the community where the students live. The concept of triadic closures stresses the importance of a three-way bond. Relationships that extended to three connections are much stronger and more resilient. The triadic relationship between students, small businesses and the adult residents in a community provides the foundation for a community – today and tomorrow. Building off the knowledge they learned in their sustainable green schools, students can cement their bond with the real pillars of the community, locally owned business through collaborate civic projects or Solutions. These relationships will also serve in a mentoring and apprenticeship capacity, to be taken advantage in the future as employment and entrepreneurial opportunities. This triad closure will create an integrated partnership that will form the basis of a community’s well-being efforts.

“Just as important as the actual accomplishment of creating a new asset for the community is the message sent to people living there: Good things can happen in this place. One of the biggest problems for poor communities, is that “we teach young people to measure success by how far they can get away from these neighborhoods.”

It’s absolutely crucial to let people know, “you don’t have to move out of your neighborhood to have a better one.” (Majora Carter — a strategy consultant, entrepreneur and grassroots real estate developer who played a pivotal role in bringing back New York’s South Bronx)

Solo flower

The Roadmap to Your Community’s Future

Imagine your community not populated by silos and generational division. Imagine your community being designed and built for all its citizens, regardless of age or status. “Building Community Through Student Engagement” is a plan to do just that.

  • Increased school performance: Create an environment for students that seamlessly connects schools to the outside community resulting higher engagement and performance (i.e. graduation rates).
  • Higher talent retention levels: Create an integrated community building platform that breaks down silos and connects students with adults for collaborative activities that transform communities into future looking places students will build on after they graduate.
  • Enhanced elderly care resources: Create an integrated community perspective that transcends generations ultimately helping older residents as much as younger as more elderly health care is needed due to demographic changes.
  • Increased environmental resourcefulness: Play off Green Schools to create a community mindset of conservation and resource maximization regardless of generation.
  • Expanded worldwide contribution: Create a foundation for students to build a better world as a whole for themselves and others by introducing them to sustainable practices and connection to the community and beyond.

Not all communities look to the future. They want to remember the past, even though that past may not have been quite as rosy as they would like to think. Change is hard. Handing over the reigns to the next generation is not a science, but an art. But whether we know it or not there is an artist in each one of us. Sometimes we just have to let those coming after us with their naive optimism, show us.

Let’s take those rose-colored glasses we’ve used to look to past … and give them to our children and grandchildren so they can point them to the future. We may even enjoy the ride.


You reach me on Twitter at @clayforberg and the Center for Green Schools at @mygreenschools.


As a part of the Community 3.0 platform we’ve put together a roster of several examples of what can come from Front Porch collaborations. These examples represent Solutions to many common needs and opportunities a community may encounter, Solutions that can bind the relationships between the generations – young and old alike.


Creating Successful Chaos Within a Well-Ordered Failure

“Our challenge is not bringing order to successful chaos but creating successful chaos within a well-ordered failure.” ~ Charles Marohn, ‘Strong Towns’

Collaboration, peer-to-peer participation and bottom-up empowerment all sounds good. And in theory … it is. The more democratic the process, the more responsive it should be. But responsiveness doesn’t necessarily translate into results. In the last piece, “Herding Cats,” organization of the masses by the masses can be exactly like that, “herding cats.” The key to any collective effort is having a defined mission that is generally agreed upon and then putting its implementation into play using a set process. In the case of Community 3.0 that mission is the physical, cerebral and spiritual well-being of your community.

Nurturing well-being by creating avenues and conduits for engagement is the road to this mission’s success. And hopefully through these efforts, the inherent benevolence of the members of your community will be unleashed. We must make “helping others” our societal norm … supplanting that of primarily making money and climbing ladder of our economic caste system. We need to create programs that not only help us … but also create opportunities that enable us to help others.

Marissa Lee Bennett
Marissa Lee Bennett

Body Without Organs – Successful Chaos

In the post Growing an Evolved Society,” I outlined the rhizome theory of societal organization developed by Deleuze and Guattari in the 1960’s. One of the components of their philosophy is the Body Without Organs. The Body Without Organs is “what happens,” the result of the Nomadic actions of the components (the populace) operating on the Smooth Space platform (Front Porches and volunteer Contributors in the community). In itself the Body Without Organs has no form until the contributions of the community are injected into it. A community’s personality and state of well-being are the results of the interactions between its Contributors and its Front Porches. It can take a conservative form or a progressive one, NIMBYism and gated communities or one more communal. Tolerant and welcoming or closed. Wall Street or Main Street.

Rather than having its personality being dictated by those in the high rungs of a traditionally mandated hierarchy – it will come to form through the participation of those who live there. How a community and its Contributors respond to its needs and opportunities … will be what it becomes.

My view of societal evolution, Community 3.0, is not a structure … it’s a result. It’s a Body Without Organs. It’s a result of the set of interactions chosen independently yet in accordance with the societal expectations and norms that create the personality of the community. While the tools used by sister 3.0 communities are the same – the way they’re used and to what ends are determined by you to create what you desire. Think of a generic set of Legos where the only constraint to what you make is your imagination. What shapes and colors you choose to use, in what combinations will be unique to you; with the constant being the collective betterment your community.

Front Porches and “Solutions”

The conduit of participation in the Community 3.0 model is the Front Porch. These informal meeting places, most often locally owned businesses, are named after gathering spots so often seen in Latino communities that are used as the focal points for neighborhood discussion and connection to the street. These Front Porches are where the Middle Ring flourishes and what the French political philosopher, Alex de Tocqueville, observed in the 1800’s as the source of America’s “exceptionalism.” They allows us to organize and take action directly, not wait on the sidelines while traditional institutions may or may not.

Your neighborhood’s Front Porch can be anywhere or anything. It can be the local pub down the street or the coffee-house where you get your morning sustenance from. It can be Bill’s garage where everyone gathers to watch Sunday football games. It can even be your kitchen table. What happens on the Front Porch is what matters … not what is looks like or where it is.

The Front Porch’s purpose is to identify Solutions, whether they be in response of needs or opportunities. These Solutions are designed to help your community pick up the slack and mend its societal safety net as well as lead it into the future. They can range from organizing a cleanup effort, to fixing a playground, to even spearheading a high school mentoring or apprentice program. And by being a Contributor, you and your community members can be involved with whatever Solution fits your strengths, desires and availabilities.

As a part of the Community 3.0 platform we’ve put together a roster of several examples of what can come from Front Porch collaborations. These examples represent Solutions to many common needs and opportunities a community may encounter. By no means is this roster comprehensive, but it’s a start.

“On-boarding” Your Local Business Community

A fundamental obstacle to scaling collective intelligence is that claimed benefit is vague and uncertain; and by this does not provide enough motivation for most people to participate. While there are civic-minded people who will contribute for social good, when the initiative depends solely on civic altruism it will struggle to scale beyond the core of committed activists and stakeholders. Initiatives are literally competing with cat gifs for people’s free time. (Simon Tegg – Scaling Collective Intelligence)

As Simon articulated in the above segment, it’s difficult to keep people motivated to stay with a collaboration. After all, the competition for their attention is cat gifs (I so want to post a gif of Orion here … but I’ll refrain). But with effective on-boarding and the use of your community’s Front Porches, I believe emotional momentum can be sustained long enough to the get the project into execution phase. After that a new momentum injection should occur once the project turns from “thinking” to “doing.” 

That being said. We still have to get people to “play” in the first place.

Although there are many causes to donate to – not nearly enough of them are hands-on volunteer projects. Being hands-on greatly increases the likelihood of the project “sticking.” Beyond helping out on Thanksgiving at your local homeless shelter, organized options are few and far in between. There’s more than enough reasons to step in and get involved; but these projects still have to be organized. Above I outlined several projects or Solutions any community can use to fill this “hands-on” gap. But again, they have to start somewhere. This somewhere is the Front Porch; specifically using the Community 3.0 model.

The connection of the Front Porch to the locally owned business community is what makes the Community 3.0 model unique. I don’t believe there will be any shortage of businesses that will want to jump on board. To be a local business and not be a part of an obvious way to pitch in and help out the community they do business in … might as well be a slap in the face of the people who patronize them. They will be conspicuous by their absence of effort.

The L.A. Finder and the Fear of Being Invisible


One the many business ventures I’ve undertaken over the years was publishing commercial arts and printing directories, first in Minneapolis in the 1980s and then later in Los Angeles with the “L.A. Finder.” All of them had one thing in common; initially we were selling blue sky. Nothing like them existed in the their respective markets. We were asking the top players in the graphic arts and printing communities to commit thousands of dollars to something they had no assurance would even happen. All they got from us was an idea and a good pitch. But that was enough. It wasn’t that they expected fantastic returns on their investment (which could be substantial including production costs). They couldn’t NOT be in the book. If their competition was represented and they weren’t – it was like they didn’t exist in the community. They were conspicuous by their absence.

I believe the same thing will happen when the stakes are even higher – the very “well-being” and future of their community. Plus, this investment in community goodwill will provide them with the competitive advantage that no big box store or Wall Street chain can duplicate. As a resident, how could you not want to do business with a company that is selflessly helping out the city you live in. You’d feel obligated. 

The goal of Community 3.0 is to create an ecosystem where your community’s Front Porches and their volunteer Contributors (customers of the participating local businesses) are in constant state of benevolent activity – building relationships, finding opportunities and creating Solutions that will benefit the community (and indirectly themselves). 

Community 3.0 is not just a program or platform … it’s a lifestyle.

The Community 3.0 network is empowered by the bleedingEDGE Experience Platform. This platform is the fuel that powers engagement and activity. The Community 3.0 automated loyalty system directly rewards customers (Contributors) for their patronization, while being kept abreast of special deals, events, Solution activities and whatever else might connect them to local business and the community through an event-driven communication system.

The bleedingEDGE Experience Platform is the conduit connecting the Front Porch (Merchant), the Contributor (customer) and their community. This “experience platform” is the communications vehicle for Deleuze and Guattari’s Smooth Space described in the piece Growing an Evolved Society.” Tailored for specific situations and events –  each communication is customized to a local business or Front Porch, personalized to each customer or Contributor and delivered via direct mail, email or text – depending on applicability. Everything is specifically timed to maximize its response and effectiveness. The platform features an automated array of over twenty templated 1 to 1 communication and loyalty programs. Each is designed to build the relationships that will strengthen your community and repair the safety net very often left unattended to fray. Think of it like your community’s own Artificial Intelligence program designed to build the civic core.

There is an awareness that to the extent that there is a network “center,” it is about being in service of and helping to connect the whole, as well as bring in the “periphery.” There is an emphasis on contribution and creating value over deferring to credentials and the usual suspects. People lead with a spirit of openness; and there is an overall effort towards growing the pie, not just carving it up into smaller pieces. (Network Impact: Different Approaches and Common Ground)

But there still needs to be a center. There needs to be a driving force to usher in this change in civic thinking. It needs a birthing process and an incubator to bring it to fruition. This is the role of Community 3.0 – a collective Front Porch whose job it is to nurture and direct its offspring.

The Community 3.0 Front Porch World Community

Up to this point we looked at the Smooth Space being limited to the local businesses and the Contributors within a community. However, the Front Porch concept scales well beyond neighborhood businesses in single communities. As long as the tenets of rhizomatic growth and nomadic movement are adhered to – why can’t our Smooth Space of community empowerment scale worldwide? 

Why can’t a farmer from Oregon, via their Front Porch, share a success story with farmer from Nigeria via theirs. Their resource requirements and availabilities may be different, but the serendipitous sharing of insight could “turn on the light,” solving a problem that changes someone’s life. Or why do we limit communication to only those of common vocations when anyone, anywhere of any profession could share Solutions to civic fixes long abandoned by their respective governments.

If the world is to transition from a “consume all you can society” to a sustainable one – why should we look only to those who are members of the institutions that created the problems in the first place? Should we not be looking for direction in places other than the established ‘lords’ in their ivory towers? However well-meaning they may be … isn’t their perspective a bit myopic? And isn’t this the case when we live under the thumb of traditional civic hierarchies … as most of us do?

We needn’t limit our options though. There is much wisdom in the streets. But unfortunately, many with the most wonderful voices are not heard because they’re not a member of the power elite of the status quo. Conferences such as Davos and Aspen only perpetuate this “echo chamber thinking.” We must make extra efforts to seek out the voices that can open our ears to the Solutions we all need to hear. Our collaborative focus needs to expand to those often looked at as unreachable … or irrelevant. First hand these people may still be metaphorically in the dark; but through a network of Front Porches they can see … and be seen. The Community 3.0 Front Porch World Community will be their light. The world’s problems and opportunities will no longer only be prioritized by those “up high,” but also by those “in the streets.”

“Our challenge is not bringing order to successful chaos but creating successful chaos within a well-ordered failure.” ~ Charles Marohn, ‘Strong Towns’

What we have now has been constructed by those “up high” in their ivory towers; and the result is unprecedented inequality. This world of neo-liberalism, global corporate expansion and government collusion has done very little for us “in the streets.” One may say it’s “well-ordered.” I say it’s more a failure.

It’s time we create a little “successful chaos.”


If you haven’t, I invite you to start by delving into my ideas by reading the series, On the Road to Your Community’s Perfect World,” This is my articulation of how we can create better, more inclusive, unique communities as the solution to our society’s pressing issues. Consider each week’s post a Mile Marker (MM), a cerebral off-ramp from the highway of your daily routine, taking a you little further down this road to a better version of society.


You can follow me on Twitter at @clayforsberg and on Google+.

“Herding Cats” and the Art of Collaboration

In one of my last pieces, Growing an Evolved Society. I strongly suggested we take the resources and connections we have and think like Solutionists rather than farming out our thinking. And if the current American presidential election doesn’t make this obvious enough – what will?

The vehicle to the transition to this Solutionist mindset is civic collaboration. It’s time to use the creative power of the collective for the betterment of our communities. But for us to truly engage we need an operational platform to synthesize our efforts. In their rhizome societal organizational theory, French philosophers Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari called this platform the Smooth Space. And the players operating on it do so on the Front Porches of our communities; most often taking form at our locally owned businesses. It’s this participation by the collective, the “people in the streets,” that is the foundation of the collaborative hybrid governance model I metaphorically described using my daughter’s Bengal Cat, “Orion.

This Smooth Space mentioned above must be an open-ended platform where invitations are extended to all, regardless professional credentials, religious affiliation or rung occupied on the socioeconomic ladder. This all-inclusionary platform will provide us the tools and guidance. Diverse groups will align around the collective causes and solutions we seek to pursue – not those pre-picked by governments, the media or the marketing budgets of self-perpetuating national non-profits and NGOs.

This platform is not to be hierarchical, but organizationally flat, as describe in Deleuze and Guattari’s rhizome metaphor. The nodes of this decentralized power structure form spontaneously according to need or Solution pursued. When a problem or opportunity arises, groups of Solutionists (Contributors) organically form around Front Porches, roles are created and activities dispatched using the resources and constructs of the platform and those involved. Volunteer Contributors move from cause to cause depending on their current passions, abilities and availabilities. Nothing is wasted. Resources are maximized and put towards the solution, not to the preservation of the organization and its ongoing administration.

Herding cats

“Herding Cats” 

Unfortunately this whole collaboration thing isn’t as easy as we would like it to be. Results don’t just magically happen with a wave of a wand … no matter the intentions (or alumnus status from Hogwarts). Working with the crowd is a lot like “herding cats.”

For many in avant-garde business and social circles, collaboration is next to godliness. Firms and organizations shovel their staff into open-plan office pits to encourage serendipitous encounters. Managers oblige their underlings to add new collaborative tools such as Slack and Chatter to existing ones such as traditional social media, e-mail and telephones. Corporate thinkers urge workers to be good corporate citizens and help each other whenever possible. (excerpts from The Collaboration Curse)

Gunther Sonnenfeld makes some very important observations as a veteran of over fifty collaborations. He breaks them down in what he calls The Truth About Collaborations.” Rather trying to paraphrase it (of which I couldn’t do it justice), I suggest you read it yourself. It’s good stuff.

Simon Tegg argues that while the internet makes massive on-line collaboration technically feasible, it also contributes to its cultural challenge.

A fundamental obstacle to scaling collective intelligence is that claimed benefit is vague and uncertain – and this by itself does not provide enough motivation for most people to participate. While there are civic-minded people who will contribute for social good, when the initiative depends solely on civic altruism it will struggle to scale beyond the core of committed activists and stakeholders. Initiatives are literally competing with cat gifs for people’s free time.

Efforts to scale collective intelligence must invest in social architecture — on-boarding, process and experience design, valuing and creating opportunities for participants at least as much, if not more, than software features. (Scaling Collective Intelligence – Simon Tegg)

As Simon pointed out, the internet can be an effective tool, but not one without problems. Identifying and synchronizing the different motivations and goals of the ‘players’ can be very difficult to do online. Whatever emotional momentum initially achieved is difficult to maintain. On the contrary, meeting face-to-face enables engaging in trust building complex conversations easier. And it’s trust that carries the interest and desire to continue when activity wanes or disagreement surfaces. This is a disadvantage of online collaborations.

The goal here is not to look at collaborative decision-making as an “either or” proposition (online or face-to-face), but rather determine what are its most effective applications and develop ways to make it work in the situations where it has the highest likelihood of success. Here the context is local and community driven efforts. Taking advantage of the physical proximity of community settings, let’s use the Front Porch as the conduit for participation and governance, as I covered in the last post. That’s not to say online collaborative tools can’t be used in conjunction. In fact their use is an integral part of the management of the implementation process.

Empathy and Inclusion

“The greatest good you can do for another is not just share your riches, but to reveal to him his own.” ~ Benjamin Disraeli

Fundamental to the Community 3.0 Front Porch collaboration philosophy is talent. Every member of the community is unique and adds to the fabric of the community; and from this fabric its personality is sown. To not use all the fabric available, is to create a misrepresentation – a forgery of our communities. Everyone has something to offer and everyone should be heard – no matter their age or social standing. It’s up to us to find it and help them see it. Our communities are only as strong as their weakest and most unfortunate.

At the beginning of this series in the posts Empathy and Shared Experiences and Cross-pollination and Creating Your Personal Renaissance,” I went into great detail on the importance of practicing empathy and embracing diversity as an integral part of community building. Left to their own volition most people will associate only with others like them (including age). They seldom take that chance and step outside their comfort zone. But if we won’t make this step, how can we truly acquire the empathy and the trust needed to have constructive conversations? How can these conversations be the one required to build the relationships necessary to create the consensus and collaborations needed for our neighborhoods and communities to serve all its residents?

A community is the product of its people. Diversity is an advantage if not a necessity. A community is a living thing, a microcosm, and a lack of diversity makes itself open to disease (literally and figuratively). Social inbreeding creates a weak species, vulnerable to adversaries, internally and externally. A community that allows this inbreeding, assumes its byproduct, myopic thinking. It will not be able to combat the problems of the future … let alone realize its potential.

Rather than obsess on economic growth as most all civic governments do, the Community 3.0 Smooth Space and Front Porches will focus on destroying the “silos” that retard our evolution while stressing the improvement of the well-being of our populace including its physical, cerebral (avenues to self-actualization) and spiritual health.

The priority of the Front Porch is to create environments that nurture hope. By creating avenues for us to engage with our world and express our creativity through a Solutionist mindset, the inherent benevolence inside us can bloom. Making “helping others” our societal norms and expectations will empower us to supplant the hopeless climb up the ladder of our current economic caste system with more altruistic ones.

The Art of Collaboration

The Minneapolis-based rap collective Doomtree is a case study in collaboration. Going against a history in the genre where many would rather kill their peers than work them. For the record (literally and figuratively), this has changed in recent years – but still Doomtree is different. The five rappers who collaborate with the crew’s two DJs are forward-thinking in that they view the idea of hip-hop as a collaborative enterprise; and it’s evident in the group’s work. Their most recent album, I’m sure not unintentionally, is titled: “No Kings.” To accomplish their distinctive results, they religiously abide by four axioms:

  • Check your ego: Most of the members have been in situations where rap is considered a competition. In fact Eminem’s famed psuedo-biopic, “Nine Mile” was all about how he used a rap competition to rise above his sordid upbringing. But in the end, as troupe member Sims says: “We’re a band … there’s no killing anyone else here.”
  • Get to where you need to get: This sounds mundane, but if everyone can’t get together physically – you can’t collaborate. And by getting together, you committed. It says this matters and “I’m prepared and willing to take the time.” In Doomtree’s case, “We end up driving a few hours from home, out of cell-phone service, like a cloistered jury or something,” Dessa says.
  • “Let’s get this done:” Once they’ve set up shop, Doomtree doesn’t do a lot of waiting around. Once one of them throws a good idea, whether it be a beat, verse or rhyme – they run with it. Not having to be the one who starts it is liberating. “I don’t have to have a verse, or I can make my verse a little bridge. It’s freeing in a way,” Sims says. “I find it really fun—it allows me to be more playful and take more risks, because if they don’t work, I don’t care.”
  • Trust the collaboration: Trusting yourself and your collaborators to know how to run with a creative instinct is a gift that comes with the freedom that this sort of process brings. And it’s something that is easiest to find when you’re not looking over your shoulder, or trying to hoard all of the elements you think you need to be great.

Below are outlined the six components of the Community 3.0 “Herding Cats” collaboration model crucial to building a Front Porch and “holding the party” for your group’s collaborative Solution efforts.

  • Building the Front Porch: “The Where”
    • Create a personality
    • Be Solutionists
    • Move around your physical location
    • change up your gathering times
  • Building the Team: “The Who”
    • “The smaller the better”
    • Diversify your team
    • Train your collaborators
  • The Facilitator
    • Leaderless organizations aren’t really leaderless
    • Beware of hidden hierarchies
  • Selecting the Project: “The What”
    • The Menu of Conversation
    • Using demographics and maps
    • Getting past the first bad idea
    • Community 3.0 Solutions
  • The Collaboration: “The How”
    • The long-lasting narrative
    • The Doomtree Method
    • Understanding participation levels
    • The “Serendipity Portal”
    • Collaboration mechanics
    • Bottlenecks
    • Deep-thinking and the time drain
    • Don’t forget mentoring
    • Nurturing communications
  • Implementation: “Walking the Talk”
    • Resource maximization
    • Solution template
    • Solution guidelines
    • The post-mortem feedback loop

For a complete breakdown: see the “Art of Collaboration” in the Community 3.0 page.

“Herding cats” … revisited

Breaking from my normal utopian outlook, I can’t stress enough a transition to a participatory society won’t be easy. America’s founding fathers proclaimed democracy is a messy endeavor. And one where “the people” actually do the work will be even more so.

However well intended collaborations are, and how they attempt to represent an equality of views – they almost inevitably end in creating bottlenecks. Often little gets done without getting run past informal “top contributors.” Special effort must be made so the most active and overburdened collaborators know how to filter and prioritize tasks and requests. They have to know it’s alright to say no (or to allocate only half the time requested). And maybe best of all, encourage them to make an introduction to someone else when the request doesn’t draw on their own unique contributions. (insight gained from Collaboration Overload)

We also can’t lose fact that the “deep thinking” needed to bring a project to fruition is a solitary task. Collaboration runs contrary to this assumption. Collaborators need to know when to collaborate and when to remove themselves from “the party” and burrow down and inside themselves.

And we can’t forget the collaboration “time drain.” More collaborations mean more meetings. And more meetings mean more time spent in meetings … and less time actually doing the work. Even though the social aspect of collaborative efforts is important, having meetings for the sake of having meetings shouldn’t be the default. Just because it’s a collaboration … doesn’t mean it automatically needs a meeting. Make the time together worth everyone’s time. Collaborations should be synergistic … not antagonistic.

Not everyone flourishes under a system self-determination either. Gabriela Krupa illustrates this on her experience with Holacracy:

“I caught myself in a paradox: I’m happy to have leeway in my work and be able to do things as I see fit, but at the same time I would appreciate someone who could point me in the right direction: ‘this is right, just continue that way’ or ‘change direction, you can do better.’ I caught myself looking for confirmation that my choices and actions were right, wanted, or useful for my colleagues.”

Just because an open organization doesn’t have a formal management structure, doesn’t mean it shouldn’t set up informal mentoring arrangements. In fact these informal relationships can work much better than formal hierarchical ones. Making these informal arrangements easy to set up should be a priority of your collaboration as they can result in substantial member development.

The above obstacles are not normally encountered in traditional hierarchical structures. But just because collaboration based organizations have their problems doesn’t mean we should shy away though. We can’t accept the status quo and the inefficiency, inequality and ineptitude it’s giving us. A society based on collaboration and inclusion must be an ideal we strive for. We have to accept the fact its going to be a challenge, a challenge that will involve a collective effort probably unlike anything modern society has seen. “Herding cats,” especially Bengals is not supposed to be easy.

Fortunately, by definition … we will not be alone.


If you haven’t, I invite you to start by delving into my ideas by reading the series, On the Road to Your Community’s Perfect World,” This is my articulation of how we can create better, more inclusive, unique communities as the solution to our society’s pressing issues. Consider each week’s post a Mile Marker (MM), a cerebral off-ramp from the highway of your daily routine, taking a you little further down this road to a better version of society.


You can follow me on Twitter at @clayforsberg and on Google+.

Growing an Evolved Society

Our true destiny is a world built from the bottom up by competent citizens living in solid communities, engaged in and by their places. – David W. Orr

In my last piece, What do the genetics of a Bengal Cat and the evolution of economics have in common?”, I proposed a hybrid type of governance as an alternative to our current political malaise and civic ineptitude. But thinking about it maybe governance isn’t really the right term. Governance implies more a state of control. What I really propose is more of a change in mindset – a mindset of community empowerment rather than a dependence on hierarchical forces housed in institutions rendered grotesque caricatures of their former intent. But to realize this new alternative we must first shed ourselves of these relics and the constraint incumbent in their archaic system design created for much simpler times ages ago.

This new hybrid is based on the conceptions of 18th Century Scottish philosopher David Hume synthesized with the pragmatic research on the commons by Nobel Prize winning economist Elinor Ostrom. Working off the premises of these two scholars, we can bring this hybrid civic mindset to reality using a set of societal and economics tools we have in the form of community Front Porches or informal neighborhood gathering places. In my model I suggest these Front Porches can take hold in the small and locally owned business community of our towns and cities.

This direct participation civic mindset is illustrated by the “wild side” (the Asian Leopard Cat) of the hybrid model I metaphorically call “Orion” after my daughter’s hybrid Bengal Cat. This mindset and the resulting direct engagement model is not focused on maintaining itself as a static organization or institution, but as a dynamic situational platform. The participation platform is designed to identify the needs and opportunities of the local community it serves while addressing them using whatever resources are available … whether monetary or not. Think of this “resource maximization” drawing from the times of our grandparents when neighbors and community members were treated as extended family and relied on as the primary “safety net.” (The other half of the hybrid, the traditional governance half, is reformed via the methods of Transpartisanship).

This is the first of five posts outlining my game plan to make this evolved civic mindset a reality. In this piece, Growing a Societal Evolution, I lay out the philosophical and structural foundation of the direct participation model I analogized in the “wild side” of Orion.

Kevin Beiler rhizome network

Rhizomes and Decentralization

Biologists say trees are social beings. They can count learn and remember. They nurse sick members, warn each other of dangers by sending electrical signals across a fungal network and for reasons unknown, keep the ancient stumps of long felled companions alive for centuries by feeding them a sugar solution through roots. (Marije van Zomeren)

To find a model for organizational structure built around resource maximization and decentralized civic participation and collaboration, we need to look no further than our backyard – in nature. One of nature’s most effective means of sustainability is the Rhizome. The Rhizome is a modified subterranean stem of a plant that is usually found underground, often sending out roots and shoots from its nodes. Rhizomes develop from axillary buds and grow perpendicular to the force of gravity. The Rhizome also retains the ability to allow new shoots to grow upwards. If a Rhizome is separated into pieces, each piece may be able to give rise to a new plant … and a new node of above ground activity.

This phenomena of decentralized activity in Rhizomes was best articulated in the philosophy or Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari in the ’60s.

“A rhizome ceaselessly establishes connections between semiotic chains, organizations of power, and circumstances relative to the arts, sciences, and social struggles … the rhizome connects any point to any other point, and its traits are not necessarily linked to traits of the same nature; it brings into play very different regimes of signs, and even nonsign states … The rhizome operates by variation, expansion, conquest, capture, offshoots.” A rhizome has no beginning or end; it is always in the middle, between things, interbeing, intermezzo. (A Thousand Plateaus)

Deleuze and Guattari broke down their rhizomatic social philosophy into several components. Below are several that are applicable to a community based construct. From here we can extrapolate to arrive at our version of a locally governed civic participation platform – the “Asian Leopard wild cat” of our hybrid.

  • Rhizome: Rather than using the organizational structure of the root-tree system which charts causality along chronological lines and looks for the single origin of “things” and looks towards conclusion of those “things;” a Rhizome continually establishes connections between threads of meaningful communication, organizations of power, and other influences (including arts, sciences, and social struggles). The planar movement of the Rhizome resists chronology and formal organization, instead favoring a Nomadic system of growth and proliferation. In this model, influence and application spreads like the surface of a body of water, spreading towards available spaces or in the application of community – maximizing the resources available to it, regardless of the type.
  • Nomad: Nomadism is a way of life that exists outside of the traditional organizational or societal norm (at least in modern times). The Nomad is a way of being in the middle or between points. It is characterized by movement and change, and is unfettered by systems of organization. The goal of the Nomad is only to continue to move within the “intermezzo.” (the journey rather than the destination). This constant state activity prevents itself from existing for the sake of existing as conventional organizations and institutions most often do. The goal is to make things happen, to find opportunities and solutions; not just to “be.” This Nomadic behavior also lends itself to the individual focusing on what interests them and where they can contribute the most, rather than just working within the constraints of a pre-defined, often inefficient role or job. In short, being a Nomad can greatly enhance ones sense of engagement and well-being. Or according to the Danish philosopher Søren Kiekegaard, be the evolved man.”
  • Smooth Space: The platform or naked infrastructure on which the community and in turn the array of “need and opportunity based activities” operate is called the Smooth Space. This platform is not formally defined, but rather takes the form of the influences that inhabit it. As outlined above, these influences can include meaningful communication, existing organizations (government and other) as well as social norms, ideals and community expectations. In the context of Community 3.0, the Smooth Space is the small business community, Front Porches, the members of the community who are their customers along with the societal norms they create. What a community does and creates with its Smooth Space will determine the well-being of its populace. It is the duty of the Rhizome structure and its Smooth Space to accommodate and nurture the intangible, serendipitous, sensual and tactical engagements of all the members of its community (i.e. empathy, creativity, collaboration and self-actualization).
  • Body Without Organs: Body Without Organs is what happens. It is the result of what the Rhizome social philosophy using the Nomadic actions of its components operating on the Smooth Space. In itself the Body Without Organs has no form until the variables of the community are injected into it. The community’s personality and overall state of well-being are the results of the interactions between its members and businesses; it’s its Body Without Organs. It can take a conservative form or a progressive one. NIMBYism and gated communities or more communal. Tolerant and welcoming or closed and silos. Wall Street or Main Street. This is the community’s personality. But rather than the personality being dictated by those in the high rungs of a traditionally mandated hierarchy – it will come to form through the participation of those who live there … those on the streets, no matter their social stature. How the community directly responds to its needs and opportunities will be what it is.

A contemporary version of this Nomadic Rhizome organizational approach is referred roughly as Open allocation. Open allocation is a management style in which employees are given freedom to choose what projects to work on, and how to allocate their time. They do not necessarily answer to a static manager, but rather to the specific project they are working on within a company or organization. They can transfer between projects as they wish as long as they are providing value. Open allocation has been described as a process of self-organization. Rather than teams and leadership arrangements existing permanently in the organization, relationships form as they are needed (around causes and projects). When the projects are completed they disband. (excerpts taken from Wikipedia)

Types of Open allocation arrangements are happening in various organizations globally in the form of peer-to-peer movements. A main societal proponent is the P2P Foundation headed by Michel Bauwens. On the corporate side, attention should be paid to the Holacracy consulting practice founded by Brian Robertson. Their highest profile client to date is the Las Vegas based internet commerce firm Zappos owned by Amazon. Zappos is an interesting case of injecting a radical systematic change into a workplace that may or may not have been culturally ready for it. There are lessons than can be learned from their transition that I cover in an upcoming post.

But probably the biggest success story for a corporate self-governing organization is the Dutch home-care organization Buurtzorg Nederland.

Buurtzorg founder, Jos de Blok, has a critical role in the company. He exerts practically no formal power or control over the decentralised teams who deliver the services and innovate new ideas. It works incredibly well and Buurtzorg easily outperforms its traditionally structured counterparts in the healthcare sector.

However, de Blok’s presence is clearly strongly felt by all. Without even needing to codify a ‘mission statement,’ there is a powerful energy in the organisation around his founding vision of transforming community healthcare by operating with a very different organisational model. De Blok is holding the space for his vision to emerge, yet allowing the thousands of employees to have all the power they need to make it happen, sometimes in ways de Blok would never have conceived himself.

Without de Blok’s direct control, they develop more and better ways to realise and expand his vision, growing Buurtzorg’s impact over time in ways he could never orchestrate as a traditional top-down leader. But he still appears to be holding the vision for the whole, at the very highest level. This is most evident through his practice of personally participating in the induction new recruits, so they truly understand the purpose of the organisation. Yvon Chouinard of Patagonia does this too. These founders know that if they have made the overall vision clear, they can set their people free to realize the vision autonomously, using all of their creativity. (Tom Nixon “Resolving the awkward paradox in Frederic Laloux’s Reinventing Organisations“)

Evolution Institution
Evolution Institution

Front Porches and Societal Evolution

The goal of Community 3.0 is to take principles of resource maximization and incorporate them with the naturalistic examples of the Rhizome organization articulated by Deleuze and Guattari. This result is a platform for community self-governance and sustainability built around informal but operationally significant gatherings, otherwise know as Front Porches. While these Front Porches can form anywhere, say even in your garage, the ideal locations will be in the locally owned businesses of our communities.

Rather than myopically obsess on economic growth as most all civic governments do, Community 3.0 Front Porches will focus on destroying the “silos” that retard our evolution and ultimately improving the overall well-being of our populace including physical, cerebral (avenues to self-actualization) and spiritual health.

It will be the priority of these Front Porches to create environments in our communities that nurture hope by empowering avenues for us to engage with our world and express our creativity through a Solutionist mindset – letting the inherent benevolence inside us bloom. By making “helping others” our societal norm and expectation … we will supplant that of the hopeless climb up the ladder of our current economic caste system.

People will gravitate towards what they want to do … and in turn do what they do best. This lifestyle of self management of interests and activities will not only benefit them, but also their community. Lives based on economic status will be replaced by those of self-actualization. Civic participation and altruism will elevate them and empower them to evolve as humans.

This is Community 3.0 … and welcome to our next societal evolution.

“The capacity of communities to solve problems may be impeded by hierarchical (whether public or private) division and economic inequality among its members. This is a perfect reason for practicing empathy and well-being as a main tenet. Inequality of income (as measured only in its limited sense) cannot be solved … but maybe inequality of attitude (and self-defined wealth) can. ~ Tom Reeves


If you haven’t, I invite you to start by delving into my ideas by reading the series, On the Road to Your Community’s Perfect World,” This is my articulation of how we can create better, more inclusive, unique communities as the solution to our society’s pressing issues. Consider each week’s post a Mile Marker (MM), a cerebral off-ramp from the highway of your daily routine, taking a you little further down this road to a better version of society.


You can follow me on Twitter at @clayforsberg and on Google+.

Solutionists and Community Empowerment Concierges

An untold effect of government is that it sucks the time and energy from wonderful well-meaning people who believe they can change it.

A couple of months back I had an experience with an environmental activist group up here in Montana where I live. Yes believe it or not, there is such a thing in Montana – the land of coal and the only state to vote for Ron Paul.

This group who will remain nameless (to protect the not so much innocent) has been active in environmental issues for about thirty years. Their efforts are focused almost exclusively on preventing the state legislation from creating carnage on the environment. This is noble pursuit, even if it is futile the majority of the time.

While I’ve always known they were here, I never paid much attention to them. At least not until this February. I noticed an article in the Billings Gazette (our local newspaper) about a speaker they were bringing in to talk about the benefits of supporting a local food economy. Even though this area is dominated by farming, virtually none of it makes from the farm to our tables. Feed corn, sugar beets and barley contracted for beer pretty much exhaust all available farm land and resources.

Coincidentally I had just published a piece outlining a ‘Farm-to-School-to-Market’ cross-generational entrepreneurial solution  as means to rural and small town prosperity. I reached out to the group by forwarding them my piece and was pleasantly surprised when I received a response the same day. From that I scheduled a meeting to see what sort of collaboration we could generate. I was excited. Kindred spirits have not been abundant in the four years I’ve been here. Here was an opportunity for things to change. Anyone who has read this blog knows my passion is community empowerment, and local food is a big part of it.

Well I met with the group, for two hours. I brought up every possible point of connection I could think of. And without going into copious detail, there were many. But in the end, after two hours … their one question was: “What are your views on influencing policy?” It was like 120 minutes of talk of community empowerment and how ‘the streets’ can change the community completely fell on deaf ears. Apparently their only concern has been, is and will be – what will government do to protect us from the proverbial big bad wolf. And in Montana … it’s not much.

After I left though, I still held out hope our meeting would produce some sort of fruit. I sent follows up emails thanking both people I talked with. I included additional relevant material, as I said I would. The response … well, there wasn’t any. No thanks for coming in. No thanks for following up. Nothing!

Their ambivalence surprised me … even though it shouldn’t. Needless to say no collaboration has come to fruition … nor am I naive enough to think it ever will.

And I’m afraid this isn’t an isolated incident. So what’s the problem? It’s like we haven’t moved from the attitudes of the Middles Ages; depending on kings, queens and lords to take care of us, telling us what we need and then giving us just a taste while we toll endlessly for these same kings, queens and lords. In the 21st century our governments don’t have the same physical control over use they once had and granted we don’t run the risk of being starved or beheaded (for the most part). But we the populace have made a conscious effort to be  just as passive, letting self-serving egotists make decision that determine our futures … and the futures of our offspring, all in hopes of maybe getting thrown bone. We do this because it’s easier. It’s easier to not think … to let others make the decisions. And even if the decisions they make are well-meaning – their abilities to implement them are questionable at best if not nonexistent.

I agree we do need the government to step in a provide a little counter balance to the corporate shenanigans we are subjected under the guise of capitalism. But does that mean we have neuter ourselves to a position of being modern-day serfs. Apparently for many of us – it does.

We need a new attitude

For two years I’ve pushing the idea of creating a ‘system within a system’ using local business as the conduit to protecting us from megalomanical corporations and functionally incapable governments, here and abroad. The response has been good, actually very good … but there’s been a disconnect. It seems like the people who I thought would be the most excited, they’re excited – don’t get me wrong … aren’t quite onboard.

It’s not about where we need to go. We agree on that. It’s how to get there.’ And in fact the ‘how to get there’ seems to be as much of an obstacle as agreement on where we’re going. It’s all about the action plan we need to take. If people agree on an action plan, say cleaning up a vacant lot or rebuilding the neighborhood elementary school playground, then political ideologies kind of don’t matter. It’s all about the ‘Middle Ring’ then. But if you can never agree on a plan of action … then nothing gets done, regardless on any commonality of goals.

By not buying into ‘the federal government will solve all of what ails us,’ I’ve been branded at times as a  libertarian. Now I have nothing against libertarians. In fact I espouse some of their tenets. But I don’t think government should be abolished. And I’m not some ‘leave me the hell alone with my cows’ rancher in Montana. I live next to these people so I can say that. Even the idea of wearing a seatbelt is an intrusion of epic proportions up here.

Government serves a purpose. I just question the ability of those involved in it to devise a competent plan and execute it. And it doesn’t help that the Fourth Estate has completely checked out. Any media critique of government is limited to campaign fundraising numbers and access to fat cats. Even any analysis of qualifications is a stretch. It seems the profession of being an elected official requires zero background or ability related to doing the job at hand. It’s like the only thing that matters is the interview process. Yet these are the exact people so many of us blindly entrust our futures to … and more unfortunately, the futures of those who have no say in the matter – our children. We are pathetic!

A big part of this ‘government-can-fix-all’ is positioning capitalism as the villain … all forms of capitalism. The new Nomad movement (or to many, the sharing economy) is the new target in their crosshairs. By just posting a single piece on the virtues of the ‘sharing movement’ I created such a frenzy amongst pro-union labor advocates, caused me to almost delete the entire stream. “We must go back to the way it was. Our old institutions need to be brought back.” Why is this attitude any different than that of the the libertarians? There is no “Holding onto Yesterday.” Yesterday is gone, and the circumstances have changed. Instead let’s take what we’ve learned, grow from it and make things best we can with what we have. And who knows maybe they’ll be even better than they were in the supposed ‘good ole days.’

In my last piece, “Apollo 13, MacGuyver and ‘Resource Maximization,” I lamented on how we already have what we need to make things better – better for all of us, rather than a select few. We just need to refocus and abandon our reliance on traditional hierarchies and the top down control they create. The power and solutions we need are in the streets with those of us who inhabit the streets … not of those living in the ‘ivory towers’ above the reality of the one whose backs they have are standing on.

Creative morass
Credit: hongkiat.com

Join me and become a Solutionist

We just need to take the resources and connections we have and think like Solutionists rather than farming out our thinking. But for Solutionists to truly excel we need to have a operational platform to operate on and synthesize our efforts.

This platform or operational foundational is not to be hierarchical, but rather organizationally flat. Any power structures created are only should be done so for each cause or ‘solution. On-going organizations and traditional institutions existing mainly for the act of self-preservation, are taboo in our new evolved ‘solution’ based societal norm. When a problem or opportunity arises, groups of Solutionists organically form and activities dispatched using the resources and constructs of the platform. Individual volunteers or Solutionists move from cause to cause depending on their current passions and availabilities. Nothing is wasted. Resources are put towards the solution, not to the preservation of the organization.

Imagine a network of volunteers emulating nature in a biomimetic fashion with resources being directed where and when need … all for the benefit for the community.

Solutionists cannot operate in a bubble though. They have to transcend Silos and arbitrary boundaries to truly reach their goal of resource maximization and collaborative community empowerment by the people.

A white-haired clergyman leans forward in deep, intent conversation with a lady with a shaved head. To the right, three shiny-suited investment bankers cluster around a banking reform activist in his twenties. Over the course of the evening, 60 people drink red wine and laugh together in the heart of London as they watch an improvisational opera singer sum up the findings of the day: the characteristics of a financial system they would collectively be proud to put their name to.

This is not a surreal scene painted by Salvador Dali, but rather a workshop convened by The Finance Innovation Lab out of London. The purpose? To capture the energy created by the financial crisis to bring together people who don’t normally talk to one another to design a new financial system. This group knew that unusual solutions were needed — ones that acknowledge the complex interconnected issues that make a failing system so hard to transform.

The range of activities these Solutionists, or as The Finance Innovation Lab calls them, Systempreneurs is broad and heavily dependent on the system they are working on. There are some common themes in how they get their work done however:

  • They create pathways through seemingly paralytic complexity
  • They host “uncomfortable alliances” amongst friends and foes
  • They create groundswells around new solutions

Whether the issues being addressed are global, such as the international banking dilemma mentioned above, or just a neighborhood clean-up effort, Solutionists understand the contributors responsible for devising and executing the solutions. They understand them by relying on empathy. They don’t impose their world or local views and preconceptions onto the group – but rather foster collaborative workable solutions.

Building community through Empowerment Concierges

Solutionists strengthen the Middle Ring. They understand that the neighborhood and the commonalities of geographic proximity can and need to transcend any differences the group may initially bring to the table. Their goal is operable solutions. After all, they’re Solutionists.

In my Community 3.0 ecosystem, the next evolution of community empowered society oriented towards street level solutions, I call them Community Empowerment Concierge. These are the Solutionists in your community that connect the people of the streets together by creating metaphorical ‘Front Porches, places where neighbors discuss what matters in their neighborhoods and communities. These are neighborhood centers of ‘do it yourself’ community problem soving. They pull from the time of our grandparents where community and neighbors were the only option. This is the basis of Community 3.0.

Now it’s easy to say what we need. And it’s even easy to say the type of people need to do what we need. But how are these people, our Community Empowerment Concierges, you and I, make this happen.

Well fasten up! I’ll cover that in the next Mile Marker of the series “On the Road to Your Community’s Perfect World,” as we delve into the ‘art of collaboration.’ And I invite you along for the ride … and most of all, I invite your participation and insight. 

Maybe with your help, Community 3.0 and community empowerment can be our next societal evolution. And maybe we can pick up our hands long enough to quit ‘dragging our knuckles’ on the pavement of our passive ‘past times behind.’ 

After all, even the Neanderthals evolved.


If you haven’t, I invite you to start by delving into my ideas by reading the series, On the Road to Your Community’s Perfect World,” This is my articulation of how we can create better, more inclusive, unique communities as the solution to our society’s pressing issues. Consider each week’s post a Mile Marker (MM), a cerebral off-ramp from the highway of your daily routine, taking a you little further down this road to a better version of society.


I can be found on Twitter at @clayforsberg and on Google+